« On the Road... | Main | Spring colors in bloom: Eleven Madison Park »

May 28, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834525ce769e200d8354979f553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lightly dressed on top at 5th and 57th: BG:

Comments

Morgan

Wow. Apparently I (or the three fashion magazines I read every fucking month, because I am just that shallow when I'm on an airplane (or it's Sunday morning)) am totally behind the times, because I? have never consciously seen those shoes before. And... I kind of like them, despite my ordinary abhorrence of logos. They remind me of the "byzantine" alhambra Van Cleef and Arpels line, which I also like. Holy shit, add the Hermes scarf, and I could suddenly look like a 50 year old WASP. I'm going to run screaming now.

Jessica

The trend doesn't seem to have hit L.A. with the same force as NYC. I've only noticed one well-preserved lady in Bev Hills wearing a pair. Maybe that's b/c T.B.'s socialite creds don't carry as much currency here, and flats aren't quite as necessary in an auto-dominated town as they are in a pedestrian city. If the fad turns out to just be a stereotypical L.A.-is-a-year-behind-NYC issue, I'll be really embarrassed for us.

Morgan

Oh, I didn't realize it was some socialite. Bah! I am always embarrassed when I see cute shoes and realize they're J. Lo's or Beyonce's. However, my recent resolution to start taking public transportation means that I need some new flats. I think I like these b/c the logo doesn't look like a logo to me. it looks like a negative space Maltese cross or something.

MBT Online

It's so nice to have you do all of the research for us. It makes our decision making so much easier!! Thanks.

The comments to this entry are closed.

August 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31


My Photo